Thursday, March 26, 2009

Thoughts on sin

We are now past the midpoint of this Lenten season and, like most people observing this time, I have become more contemplative in the last few weeks. I have been reading a book called The Concept of Sin by Joseph Pieper both for my own education and for a paper I am working on. Pieper does an excellent job in this work of explaining exactly how sin is defined in the Christian tradition and successfully scrapes off the barnacles of public opinion and cultural misunderstandings of sin. I could write at length about the various points that Pieper makes (in fact I am doing just that for one of my classes) but today I just wanted to bring up one point that hit me in the chest as I was reading.

Pieper’s explanation of sin is fairly in depth and covers a lot of ground, but what essentially makes an act a sin (or more to the point, a mortal sin) is that it is an act that intentionally moves away from God and towards the self. He establishes this point early on but throughout the rest of the book he keeps returning to the question “How is it possible for us to knowingly turn away from God?” This question can be restated by paraphrasing Paul’s thoughts: Why do I not do the things I know to be good and right but do the things I know to be wrong? The answer Pieper comes to towards the end of the book is found in our identity as created beings. God is all good and it is impossible for Him to be otherwise because this is the state he has always held. In fact, explaining his goodness by saying he has always been this way it misleading because it denotes temporal existence, it is more accurate to say that He is good. He was not created with good attributes, he is good. When God created man, He did so in His own image. For that reason man is capable of being good just as God is good. But it is this creation that sets us apart. We are created in God’s image, so we have the potential for good but it is what we were created from that gives us the potential for evil: nothing. God did not form us from some eternally existing matter. He called our being forth from nothing. Because of this we always have the potential to return to nothing, to turn from God and face the void.

As I read this section of the book, I felt a heaviness slide over me. It reminded me of that feeling when you are driving in the winter, listening to your radio, and enjoying the day not thinking about anything else until you suddenly realize that the traffic in front of you has suddenly stopped. You push the brake but the icy road prevents you from stopping fast enough. Your carefree, happy world was suddenly violated by the reality of danger. Reading Pieper’s explanation made me suddenly aware of the danger I was in. This is not the first time I had realized that sin was a movement towards nothingness. I had read enough Pieper and St. Aquinas before to be familiar with this thought. But this was the first time that I had truly considered my origins in that nothingness. It suddenly became clear that when I try to focus on myself and not God I am looking into the void and moving towards it. In fact, I was drawn to it like man who feels pulled back to a rundown, dirty town simply because it was once his home.

I had bought into the illusion that there was a separation between God and everything else; that all that existed was neutral matter that God simply had a deed for; creation was God’s in the same sense that my house is mine. But this is a lie. As soon as we try to remove God from our perspective and take Him out of creation we cannibalize ourselves until there is nothing left. We can see this happening in philosophy already. Beginning in the renaissance philosophers shifted our focus from a God centered viewpoint to a Man centered viewpoint. With each movement after that, Enlightenment, Romanticism, Modernism, and now Postmodernism , we see the destruction and disintegration of the self. We turned from God and sought truth in the institutions of man but found them to be corrupt. We looked in community in nature and found chaos, we looked to our senses but found them unreliable, finally we looked to our own self but had no reason to claim legitimacy. We dammed up the River of Life and started devouring creation but nothing we consume could sustain itself. It all turned into dust in our mouths. So we kept devouring till there was nothing left.

This perspective has really affected me deeply. I think it is probably the case with many people in the world including Christians that we separate God from his creation. We can easily picture turning our back on God to focus on the other things we are more interested in. We wake up Sunday morning and decide to go to Denny's and play some golf instead of going to church. Even when we are convicted by our choice we only see this as rejecting church or, at most, setting God aside. But in reality we are rejecting God, the milk we drink at breakfast, the car we drive, the grass we tee off from and everything else. To reject God is to reject all of creation. We must see our lives on these terms. Every action we take, every thought, every feeling is moving us either closer to God and his infinite goodness or closer to the nothingness from which we came. I often recall one of my professors saying that the greatest compliment you can give someone is to say "it is good that you exist." In honoring God we say to all creation that it is good that it exists. In sin we are saying too all things I don't care that you exist. In my sin I tell my 4 month old son, I don't care that you exist. This is a sobering thought for this sobering season.
Sorry for the downer on my first post in a while but it is Lent you know. Easter will be here soon and I will post something a bit more positive.
Dan, 9:54 PM


Binary thinking is routinely shunned these days as antiquated and simplistic. Everything is a shade of gray. The benefit of this type of thinking is that morality becomes this nebulous entity that you can try for but just about any choice can be justified. We forget, or perhaps ignore, that the most fundamental realities and the most important decisions are binary in nature. As you say, we are either choosing God or choosing ourselves. Augustine expressed the same notion in his City of God, with his amor sui/amor Dei dichotomy. I desperately desire to see our country and the world return to a more clear understand of sin, but with the current infectious philosophy that dominates our culture it will not come easily. The dominant progressive/postmodern ideology is open to any worldview except that from which we came, namely Christianity. The great irony is that by rejecting the worldview we came from they are pursuing precisely that from which they came, nothing.
Blogger Jason, at 11:13 AM  
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Blogger Mrs. Sara, at 1:18 PM  
This comment has been removed by the author.
Blogger Dan, at 1:19 PM  
Good points. The false notion that we can enjoy our lives and reject God kind of reminds me of all those "anarchists" who rant about overthrowing the government and whine about corporate greed while they blog on their $3000 apple laptops, shop at the mall, and freak out when someone stole their CDs out of their car last weekend.
I think that this ironic existence is fulfilling what G.K. Chesterton was saying when he wrote about the thought that ends thought. Most people on some level have understood that denying God turns our thoughts into nothing more than movements in the brain of a bewildered ape. But instead of taking the final rational step over the edge by saying I have no right to think at all, most people have decided to live in limbo and ignore reason altogether. Thus they are able to think and act in any number of incompatible ways. But I truly believe that this type of lifestyle is the reason for depression growing in leaps and bounds in our culture.
Blogger Dan, at 1:20 PM  
I accidentally posted on the wrong account so I deleted it.
Blogger Dan, at 1:21 PM  
Inquire Our Uncouth Prices at, The ‚lite [b][url=]Online Chemist's boutique [/url][/b] To [url=]Buy Viagra[/url] Online ! You Can also Concoct Out of proportion Deals When You [url=]Buy Cialis[/url] and When You You [url=]Buy Levitra[/url] Online. We Also Be subjected to a Mammoth Generic [url=]Phentermine[/url] On account of Your Victuals ! We This point in time away Marque eminence [url=]Viagra[/url] and Also [url=]Generic Viagra[/url] !
Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:30 AM  
Enthusiasm casinos? scrutinization this advanced [url=]casino[/url] disappear and leak into b take for granted up online casino games like slots, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and more at .
you can also into our redesigned [url=]casino[/url] orientate at and spread the slit insight fabulously unseemly !
another late-model [url=]casino spiele[/url] consort with is , because german gamblers, separatrix up manumitted online casino bonus.
Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:13 AM  
[url=]online casino[/url], also known as accepted casinos or Internet casinos, are online versions of gigantic ("buddy and mortar") casinos. Online casinos assistance gamblers to contend in and wager on casino games in toto the Internet.
Online casinos superficially tell odds and payback percentages that are comparable to land-based casinos. Some online casinos upon higher payback percentages with a gamble a woman's make in spell automobile games, and some transmogrify known payout consequence profit audits on their websites. Assuming that the online casino is using an aptly programmed indefinitely infant up generator, catalogue games like blackjack clothed an established borderline edge. The payout holding search of these games are established by the rules of the game.
Uncountable online casinos promise minus or beget their software from companies like Microgaming, Realtime Gaming, Playtech, Worldwide Imposture Technology and CryptoLogic Inc.
Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:32 AM  

Add a comment